The Salt Room (Orlando, Florida)

TRACK TOP
Posted on November 20th, 2009 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in news. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Some friends of mine are launching a new business in town called The Salt Room. It’s a new salt therapy treatment center which will be located in Orlando where folks with a variety of respiratory and skin diseases can come for relief of their symptoms. Basically, they have three rooms which are filled with salt — there is salt on the walls, on the floor, and in the air. And when you breathe it you get a concentrated feeling much like what you get when you breathe the salt air on the beach or in a deep salt cave.

Visit the Salt Room Orlando web site.

Tags: ,

Confirmit Flex Announced

TRACK TOP
Posted on November 20th, 2009 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Internet Survey Software. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Confirmit, one of the biggest online research software companies (they make the survey software that the big research firms use) has announced Confirmit Flex, a new application platform that makes it possible for the company to develop new applications for clients quickly, effortlessly and without disrupting the main Confirmit service that so many companies count on.

One example of the new technology is the ability of Confirmit users to have their survey automatically rendered “outside the HTML/browser paradigm.” For example, Confirmit Flex makes it easy to program your survey for regular web users and then have that survey also appear on iPhones, or in Flash, or as a Widget on a blog.

The software makes it possible for Confirmit to launch new elements of it’s system quickly, without disrupting the regular “main” Confirmit codebase which is so important to so many research agencies. As they describe it:

Effectively, Confirmit Flex has allowed us to create a system that at its heart is a super-tanker (Confirmit) but which can be improved by speed boats (Flex components) enabling us, our partners, and clients to respond rapidly to market changes and take advantageof emerging technologies.”

Read more about Confirmit Flex (including more technical details)

Confirmit Flex Press Release

Tags: ,

Ruby Tabulation Software

TRACK TOP
Posted on October 20th, 2009 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Data Analysis Software. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Tim Macer of meaning ltd. wrote an article about Ruby Tabluation Software from the Australian firm Red Centre Software. I’ve always struggled way ways to automate the analysis and reporting on my ongoing surveys so I was intrigued. I signed up for the trial (they were very flexible — first they spent about an hour and a half with me on a webinar and then they let me try the full, unencumbered version of the software for more than a month) and fell in love with it.

As Tim Macer reports, it does have a bit of a learning curve, but once you work your way through the various manuals (one manual for data processing and setting up surveys; another manual for doing actual data analysis) you’ll find that the software is exceptionally powerful and very useful. It has a variety of data important options, a number of different ways you can process the data, and it integrates very well with Microsoft Excel and Powerpoint.

I won’t rewrite all of Tim’s article (you can read it by following the link below), but I will say that if you do a lot of tracking surveys and want to easily be able to cut your data every which way in a fairly effortless manner (once you get the survey set up right!) then this is the software package for you.

Read Tim Macer’s review of Ruby Tabulation Software

Visit the Red Centre Software website

Tags: , , , , , ,

PASW Statistics 18.0 (SPSS Statistics) New Features

TRACK TOP
Posted on July 9th, 2009 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Data Analysis Software. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SPSS has announced the new features that they plan to the upcoming release of PASW Statistics 18 (formerly know as SPSS Statistics 18, or SPSS Base).

  • Improved research and reporting tools
  • New bootstrapping module for more stable models
  • New non-parametrics tests procedure
  • Automated data preparation for easier model building
  • New Direct Marketing add-on module
  • More customizability in the base PASW Statistics
  • Easier enterprise integration, deployment and management

PASW Bootstrapping Module

As I understand it, this new module lets you automatically run statistical tests on thousands of randomly drawn sub-samples of your dataset, which lets you minimize impact of outliers and anomalies on your results. If this is easy to use it could be exceptionally useful and time saving. It can be applied to the following SPSS/PASW procedures:

  • Descriptive Procedures
    • Frequencies (PASW Statistics Base)
    • Descriptives (PASW Statistics Base)
    • Examine (PASW Statistics Base)
    • Means (PASW Statistics Base)
    • Crosstabs (PASW Statistics Base)
    • T-tests (PASW Statistics Base)
    • Correlations (PASW Statistics Base)
    • Partial Correlations(PASW Statistics Base)
  • Modeling Procedures
    • One-Way (PASW Statistics Base)
    • UniAnova (PASW Statistics Base)
    • GLM (PASW Advanced Statistics)
    • Regression (PASW Regression)
    • Nominal Regression (PASW Regression)
    • Discriminant (PASW Statistics Base)
    • Logisitic Regression (PASW Regression)
    • Binary Multi-nominal Logistic Ordinal Regression (PASW Statistics Base)
    • GENLIN (PASW Advanced Statistics)
    • Linear Mixed Models (PASW Advanced Statistics)
    • Cox Regressions (PASW Advanced Statistics)

PASW Direct Marketing

SPSS PASW Direct Marketing is a new model specifically designed to make statistical procedures that can be used to better understand customers more accessible and easier to use.  This is accomplished by cleanly packaging six different procedures/techniques that might be accomplished through other means but that are unlikely to ever be done simply because they are so complex. It appears here that SPSS has made it fairly easy. These procedures are:

  • RFM Analysis allows users to score and rank customers by analyzing a combination of how recently they made their last purchase, how frequently they purchase, and how much they spend. The results can then be analyzed and output in a variety of ways.
  • Cluster Analysis allows you to group your customers/data into different market segments which can be used to improved your targeting. It includes an interactive model viewer that allows the user to visualize and play with the results in real time.
  • Control Package Test allows you to utilize the results of marketing campaigns to figure out which of your customers are most likely to respond to similar campaigns.
  • Propensity to Purchase Analysis lets you determine which of your customers are the “lowest hanging fruit” so you can minimize your marketing costs.
  • Postal Code Analysis helps you determine best locations for brick-and-mortar stores and other geographic sensitive decisions.

PASW Statistics Developer

PASW Statistical Developer is a new module that gives PASW Statistics users access to thousands of free R algorithms and packages using an interact that is “indistinguishable” from PASW Statistic’s built-in dialogs.

Non-Parametric Testing

Offers more non-parametric testing, which is the ability to make multiple comparisons with non-normal (that is, non-bell shaped) data.

A few links with more information:

PSAW Statistics 18 will be released on August 17, 2009. SPSS will be hosting an online event in which they intend to go through all of the new features. Sign up here.

Tags: , , , ,

20 Questions a Journalist Should Ask About Poll Results

TRACK TOP
Posted on April 27th, 2009 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in survey development. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

My apologies, gentle reader, for the fact that I appear to have fallen off the Earth for the past several months — work has been exceptionally busy, and I haven’t had much time to look at research ssoftware. I can tell you that right now I am using Qualtrics and having a great time with it.

In other news, I came across a particularly good article on the web site of the National Council on Public Polls by Sheldon Gawiser and G. Evans Witt entitled, “20 Questions a Journalist Should Ask About Poll Results.” Im not a journalist — but what I find particularly helpful about this article is that it helps me understand the way other people are viewing (or should be viewing) my research and gives me some great things to think about when I’m putting together my own projects.

Some of the key questions include:

  • Who did the poll?
  • Who paid for the poll and why was it done?
  • How many people were interviewed?
  • How were those people chosen?
  • What group were those people chosen from?
  • Are the results based on everyone who was interviewed?
  • How were the interviews conducted
  • What is the sampling error?

Etc, etc. There are 20 questions in all, and each question is followed by a detailed answer. To read the article, go to the NCPP web site.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Online Survey Content Security Doesn’t Exist

TRACK TOP
Posted on November 11th, 2008 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Internet Survey Software. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

I received an interesting question from a reader earlier today about survey security. While I’m not actually answering his question here, it did raise an interesting point about online research — which is this: there really truly is no way to protect the content that you display in your survey from falling into the wrong hands. If you have a secret product or concept , your best bet for keeping it secret is not to test it using online research.

Before sending me the note telling me just how wrong I am, record the following:

As I figure it, there are four different kinds of security as it applies to online surveys. The first kind of security is what we’ll refer to here as back-end security. This basically means that strangers can’t simply log into the survey software server and start making changes to your survey, or download your data, or do all sorts of other things which really ought to be protected by a good password. Most survey systems do a pretty good job with this, assigning separate accounts, usernames, and passwords to each survey respondent. Some even take it to the next level, by allowing account administrators to set different permission levels for each user on the account, thereby ensuring that people who are meant to have access to your survey can’t “accidentally” go and make changes.

The second kind of survey security is where only authorized people are allowed to take your survey. Some implement this feature by giving you one respondent password that you can share will all of your respondents, or some systems even allow you to give every respondent their own password (or access key) which not only keeps out the riff raff, but also makes sure that each respondent can take the survey only once. This type of security not only ensure that only the “right” people take your survey, but also that the wrong people can’t get access to the content of the survey.

I’ve seen this kind of survey software security implemented well, but I’ve also seen it implemented poorly. Some systems, instead of assigning each survey an ID made up of a random collection of letters and numbers, use a sequential, easy to guess series. Which means that it really isn’t all that hard to view (and possibly edit!) surveys written by other clients of the survey system. So watch out for that.

The third kind of security about the connection between the respondent’s computer and the survey software server. Is it secure (look for the https: in the URL). Frankly, unless you’re doing super secret stuff and your concerned that hackers and government agents are trying to listen in on your respondents, I’m not sure it is something you need to worry too much about. But if you are afraid of industrial espionage or that someone is going to tap into your wireless signal, then you may want to take the precaution of choosing a system that allows for encrypted connections.

It’s easy enough for a well thought out survey software program to provide good security surrounding these first three measures. Where they get into trouble — and where you get into trouble if you believe them — is when they start to protect your survey content.

The fourth kind of survey software security is content protection, which basically means keeping your untrustworthy respondents from copying the top secret images and product descriptions that you include in your survey onto public web sites or your competitor’s email account.

I know, I know…there are survey systems that feature technologies that make it harder to copy images or capture video. This can be done using javascript, or by doing some crazy encryption to the feed. One could even go so far as taking over the computer so that nothing else works except the survey.

But I have a camera. And I have a video camera. And if you don’t completely lock down my computer, I have some really good screen capture software that lets me capture both audio, images and pictures. If I want to capture your survey content, believe you me, I will capture your survey content.

And then I can do pretty much anything I want with it, can’t I? No doubt 600-1000 people took that confidential survey of yours, and how are you going to know which one of them posted it to the anonymous message posting board using an anonymous IP address?

I suppose it is theoreticaly possible to embed a visual identifier into each image (a watermark of sorts) so you can trace the image back to whoever posted it online, but I’ve never heard of technologies built into survey software (if it does exist please let me know — I’ll report it here!).

There are also ways you can reduce the risk. You can, for example, use a pre-screened panel made up of people you trust. Employees, for example. Another approach is to threaten your respondents with legal action (although most will figure out pretty quickly that you have no way of identifying them). You could also threaten to stop doing online surveys if they leak your secret.

But the best way to ensure that your super secret new business idea doesn’t leak out onto the Internet is not to do online research (there, I said it). If your entire business model is based around keeping something confidential, do not put it in an online environment in front of strangers. Period. And don’t trust any research firm that says they have a foolproof method of keeping your images, video and other content safe. If they do, just pull out your camera or video camera and press record.

Tags: , , , ,

Selecting the Right Respondents for your Survey (Setting your Quotas)

TRACK TOP
Posted on October 25th, 2008 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in learning. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Not all respondents are created equal. It’s true. Just because you can convince someone to take your survey doesn’t mean you necessarily want them to take your survey. In fact, ensuring that the right respondents take your survey (in the right proportions) is probably among the most important things you can do to ensure that you finish your project with survey results that you can use. (more…)

Tags: , , , ,

SPSS Statistics 17.0 Frustrates Me (a review)

TRACK TOP
Posted on October 22nd, 2008 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Data Analysis Software, commentary. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

I finally received my copy of SPSS Statistics 17 a couple of days ago and determined that I would try to push past my frustration with the “new and improved” Java-based interface and use it to analyze some data for a report I’m working on. But I can’t do it. There aren’t enough compelling features in the new version of SPSS to help me get past my frustration with the Java interface. So I’m sticking with SPSS 15. (more…)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Favorite Survey Software Packages for 2008

TRACK TOP
Posted on October 18th, 2008 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Internet Survey Software, Reviews. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

I know I said I wasn’t going to do this, but I get asked this question a lot so I’ve caving in. Here are my (current) favorite survey software packages:

Qualtrics: (internet survey software) has a fantastic variety of question types with a really easy to use survey development system. Also features advanced survey branching capabilities including looping, random blocks of questions and more.

SurveyGizmo: (internet survey software) Also extremely easy to use survey package with a lot of features. Probably the most “Web 2.0″ survey system out their. Friendly, irreverant, with plenty of features for both the advanced user who wants to control every element of the survey experience and the analyst who just wants to get the project done. Has good e-mail invite capabilities, basic analysis tools. Plus, the free account has more features than any other “free” accounts I’ve seen. (more…)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

SPSS 18 New Features Survey

TRACK TOP
Posted on October 17th, 2008 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Data Analysis Software. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SPSS has been conducting a survey for the last couple of weeks to help them develop SPSS Statistics 18 (the “new” name of what has formerly just been known as SPSS 17). One generally imagines that the questions that are asked provide insight into the types of new features they are considering, (more…)

Tags: , , , , , ,

Great Statistical Resource: The Analysis Factor StatChat

TRACK TOP
Posted on October 10th, 2008 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Recommended Reading. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Statistical consultant Karen Grace-Martin launched a new blog in July, 2008 called “StatChat” which makes a lot of relevant, important, but sometimes hard to grasp statistical concepts easy to understand. Categories of postings include linear regression, missing data, spss, sas, anova, factor analysis, and sample size — things that all market research deal with on a regular basis (whether they like it or not!).

Karen is the founder and president of The Analysis Factor, a professional statistical consulting firm. Karen holds advanced degrees in both applied statistics and social psychology. She was a professional statistical consultant at Cornell University for seven years before founding her own company, and has taught statistics at the University of California Santa Barbara and Santa Barbara City College. She has also co-written an introductory statistics textbook called Data Analysis with SPSS.

http://www.analysisfactor.com/statchat/

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

SPSS 17.0 Features Announced

TRACK TOP
Posted on July 14th, 2008 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Data Analysis Software, Reviews. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SPSS 17.0 will feature improved research and reporting tools, greater accessibility for business users combined with new functionality for statistical programmers, and easier enterprise integration, deployment and management.

SPSS 17.0 new features will include:

  • Various new algorithms, plus improved speed and performance with additional multithreaded procedures.
  • New multiple imputation procedure in SPSS Missing Values that helps you more easily compelte datasets for more reliable analysis
  • Updated syntax editor that makes it easier to create, test and correct syntax
  • Improved integration with Microsoft Office
  • New SPSS EZ RFM (Recency, Frequency, Monetary value) module to help analysts identify top customers and clients
  • Ability to integrate third-party applications, procedures, and graphics packages created in R (through plug-ins)
  • Enhanced administrative tools to improve IT configuration of software.

Also to be released is a new SPSS EZ RFM module, designed to help marketers use recency, frequency, and monetary value analysis to find their most valuable customers.

Tags: , , , , ,

SPSS or Excel?

TRACK TOP
Posted on May 26th, 2008 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Data Analysis Software. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Why use a data analysis package like SPSS when you could use Excel? I’ve just come across an interesting marketing piece from SPSS that goes into benefits one gets from using a dedicated data analysis package instead of trying to do all of your analysis in a spreadsheet. While it would be fair to expect that this isn’t necessary an unbiased comparison, it might offer some food for thought to those of you trying to figure out why you should bother to upgrade. (more…)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Four Factors That Determine the Maximum Length of Your Online Survey

TRACK TOP
Posted on April 30th, 2008 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in learning. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

How long should your online survey be? I’ve seen and participated in a number of discussions on this topics over the last several years. After all, you want to collect as much information as possible from your respondents but at the same time you don’t want to annoy them to the point where they quit the survey half-way through. I’ve compiled a list of four factors/questions which determine how long your online survey can reasonably be to avoid dropouts. (more…)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Survey Software Email Deliverability Issues

TRACK TOP
Posted on April 2nd, 2008 by Mark Kupferman. Filed in Survey Software Industry, learning. No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Most survey software systems offer the ability to send out invitations to your potential respondents on your behalf. But how many of the e-mails actually get through, and how many end up in the spam folder? If there is one thing I’ve learned over the years, you can’t assume that your survey software provider will offer the same level of e-mail deliverability management as an e-mail vendor. (more…)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,